Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium Gold G5400T outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium Gold G5400T is 2364 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 19% cheaper than Pentium Gold G5400T - CA$99.02 vs CA$122.95
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400T
- Performs up to 38% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-6100 - 29 vs 21 FPS
- Up to 10% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than FX-6100 - CA$4.24 vs CA$4.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$99.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
29
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$122.95
80%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$122.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G5400T |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |