Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 3117 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 34% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - CA$98.43 vs CA$150.0
- Up to 10% better value when playing Dead Island 2 than Ryzen 3 3100 - CA$0.86 vs CA$0.96 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 36% better in Dead Island 2 than FX-6100 - 156 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
115
73%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 299 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
156
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.96/FPS
89%
Price, CA$
CA$150
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 299 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |