Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 4471 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - CA$98.43 vs CA$159.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i3-14100F - CA$0.47 vs CA$0.66 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 14% better in Fortnite than FX-6100 - 241 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
211
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
241
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.66/FPS
71%
Price, CA$
CA$159
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$159 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |