Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4370 outperforms the more expensive FX-6100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4370 is 1013 days newer than the more expensive FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 12% better in Valorant than FX-6100 - 756 vs 678 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than FX-6100 - CA$84.99 vs CA$98.43
- Up to 27% better value when playing Valorant than FX-6100 - CA$0.11 vs CA$0.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
756
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.11/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$84.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-4370 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |