Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-8150 outperforms the more expensive FX-6100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-8150 and the more expensive FX-6100 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6100 - 90 vs 89 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than FX-6100 - CA$87.12 vs CA$98.43
- Up to 13% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6100 - CA$0.97 vs CA$1.11 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
90
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |