Buy on Amazon
CA$98.43
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7500T outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7500T is 1910 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i5-7500T - CA$98.43 vs CA$98.89
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Performs up to 28% better in War Thunder than FX-6100 - 163 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 22% better value when playing War Thunder than FX-6100 - CA$0.61 vs CA$0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
AMD FX-Series FX-6100 FX6100 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD6100WMW6KGU FD6100WMGUSBX
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Core i5-7500T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
163
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.89
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80677I57500T 7th Generation Intel Core i5-7500T Processor
Buy for CA$98.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i5-7500T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
