Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4370 outperforms the more expensive FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4370 is 1013 days newer than the more expensive FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 10% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8150 - 129 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than FX-8150 - CA$84.99 vs CA$87.12
- Up to 11% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8150 - CA$0.66 vs CA$0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 8 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
129
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$84.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |