Buy on Amazon
CA$84.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4370 outperforms the more expensive FX-6100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4370 is 1013 days newer than the more expensive FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 16% better in Minecraft than FX-6100 - 686 vs 591 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than FX-6100 - CA$84.99 vs CA$98.43
- Up to 29% better value when playing Minecraft than FX-6100 - CA$0.12 vs CA$0.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 6 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-4370
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
686
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$84.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-4370 3.8 GHz FCLGA1150 Processor (BX80646I34370)
Buy for CA$84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
AMD FX-Series FX-6100 FX6100 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD6100WMW6KGU FD6100WMGUSBX
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-4370
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
