Buy on Amazon
CA$83.57
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms the more expensive FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1420 days newer than the more expensive FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 5% better in Need For Speed Unbound than FX-6100 - 127 vs 121 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than FX-6100 - CA$39.99 vs CA$83.57
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-Series FX-6100 FX6100 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD6100WMW6KGU FD6100WMGUSBX
Buy for CA$83.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
Intel BX80662G4400 Pentium Processor G4400, 3.3 GHz
Buy for CA$39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| FX | Collection | Pentium |
| Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
