Buy on Amazon
CA$83.57
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms the more expensive FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 932 days newer than the more expensive FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than FX-6100 - 506 vs 502 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than FX-6100 - CA$41.21 vs CA$83.57
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-Series FX-6100 FX6100 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD6100WMW6KGU FD6100WMGUSBX
Buy for CA$83.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1840 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.8 GHz 2M 53W LGA1150
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
