Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1840 outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1840 is 555 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 2% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-6300 - 60 vs 59 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than FX-6300 - CA$41.21 vs CA$59.57
- Up to 32% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-6300 - CA$0.69 vs CA$1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 6 vs 2 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
60
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |