Buy on Amazon
CA$59.57
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1988 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6300 - 93 vs 90 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than FX-6300 - CA$49.99 vs CA$59.57
- Up to 18% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6300 - CA$0.54 vs CA$0.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-Series FX-6300 CPU Used 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop Processor 3.5 GHz 8M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
93
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
