Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 945 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - CA$49.99 vs CA$138.88
- Up to 63% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-6100 - CA$0.43 vs CA$1.15 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G4900 - 121 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 51 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
117
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13102 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
121
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.15/FPS
37%
Price, CA$
CA$138.88
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |