Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G4560 outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G4560 is 1533 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4560 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-6300 - 233 vs 229 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than FX-6300 - CA$49.99 vs CA$59.57
- Up to 19% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than FX-6300 - CA$0.21 vs CA$0.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
233
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Pentium G4560 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |