Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 1818 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - CA$41.21 vs CA$86.99
- Up to 48% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i3-9100F - CA$0.52 vs CA$1.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 10% better in Remnant II than Celeron G1840 - 87 vs 79 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
79
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
87
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1/FPS
52%
Price, CA$
CA$86.99
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$86.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |