Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4370 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4370 is 407 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Celeron G3900 - 150 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i3-4370 - CA$42.99 vs CA$84.99
- Up to 47% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i3-4370 - CA$0.3 vs CA$0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4370 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
150
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.57/FPS
52%
Price, CA$
CA$84.99
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
145
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$42.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$42.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |