Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1696 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Up to 23% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - CA$51.56 vs CA$67.21
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$67.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Buy for CA$51.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
98.64176570458405%
Multi-Core
992
58.525073746312685%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |