Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-2500 is 1208 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G1840 - 508 vs 506 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-2500 - CA$41.21 vs CA$61.82
- Up to 20% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i5-2500 - CA$0.08 vs CA$0.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500 - 53 vs 95 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
508
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.1/FPS
80%
Price, CA$
CA$61.82
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$61.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
506
99.60629921259843%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
85.73853989813243%
Multi-Core
854
50.383480825958706%
Intel Core i5-2500 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |