Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 490 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - CA$66.34 vs CA$118.88
- Up to 41% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-7100 - CA$0.35 vs CA$0.59 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G3900 - 202 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
192
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15293 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
202
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
59%
Price, CA$
CA$118.88
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$118.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15294 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |