Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1533 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-7100 - 240 vs 233 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - CA$96.0 vs CA$125.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i3-7100 - CA$0.4 vs CA$0.54 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
240
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |