Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 618 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 188 vs 180 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - CA$99.95 vs CA$136.52
- Up to 30% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 3 3200G - CA$0.53 vs CA$0.76 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
Buy for CA$136.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |