Buy on Amazon
CA$33.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $353
Availability
MSRP in USD: $353
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1920 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-875K - 322 vs 320 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i7-875K - CA$33.99 vs CA$112.0
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80
Buy for CA$33.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75670 minutes ago
Intel Core I7-875K I7 875K I7 875 2.933 GHz Used Quad-Core Eight-Thread CPU Processor LGA 1156
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75670 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
