Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4237 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 1% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - CA$112.0 vs CA$112.98
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-875K - 124 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 10% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-875K - CA$0.91 vs CA$1.01 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17555 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
124
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17555 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Lynnfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |