Buy on Amazon
CA$112
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $353
Availability
MSRP in USD: $353
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4560 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4560 is 2410 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 13% cheaper than Pentium G4560 - CA$112.0 vs CA$128.88
- Up to 10% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Pentium G4560 - CA$1.23 vs CA$1.37 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4560 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-875K - 94 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
91
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core I7-875K I7 875K I7 875 2.933 GHz Used Quad-Core Eight-Thread CPU Processor LGA 1156
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18559 minutes ago
Pentium G4560
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
94
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.37/FPS
89%
Price, CA$
CA$128.88
86%
FPS Winner
Intel Pentium G4560 3.5GHz Kaby Lake CPU LGA1151 Desktop Smart Cache Boxed
Buy for CA$128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18559 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Pentium G4560
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Pentium |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
