Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3943 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - CA$112.0 vs CA$159.99
- Up to 24% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-10105 - CA$0.44 vs CA$0.58 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 22 than Core i7-875K - 277 vs 253 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
253
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
277
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.58/FPS
75%
Price, CA$
CA$159.99
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$159.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |