Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1920 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Lost Ark than Core i7-875K - 227 vs 225 FPS
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-875K - CA$21.99 vs CA$112.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i7-875K - CA$0.1 vs CA$0.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
227
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$21.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$21.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Lynnfield | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |