Buy on Amazon
CA$112
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $353
Availability
MSRP in USD: $353
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 3250 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - CA$112.0 vs CA$138.88
- Up to 6% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-9100F - CA$1.23 vs CA$1.31 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 16% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-875K - 106 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
91
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core I7-875K I7 875K I7 875 2.933 GHz Used Quad-Core Eight-Thread CPU Processor LGA 1156
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18580 minutes ago
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
106
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.31/FPS
93%
Price, CA$
CA$138.88
80%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-9100F Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W, BX80684I39100F
Buy for CA$138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18581 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
