Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7500T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7500T is 490 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-7500T - CA$66.34 vs CA$98.89
- Up to 30% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-7500T - CA$0.4 vs CA$0.57 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G3900 - 172 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
167
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17422 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
172
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.57/FPS
70%
Price, CA$
CA$98.89
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$98.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17423 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |