Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4440 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4440 is 730 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-4440 - CA$33.99 vs CA$77.09
- Up to 54% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-4440 - CA$0.22 vs CA$0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Core i5-4440 - 51 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G3900 - 162 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
156
96.29629629629629%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$33.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$33.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50511 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
162
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.48/FPS
45.833333333333336%
Price, CA$
CA$77.09
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$77.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50513 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
56.24394966118103%
Multi-Core
992
34.18332184700207%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-4440 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |