Buy on Amazon
CA$33.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1043 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8320 - 192 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 69% cheaper than FX-8320 - CA$33.99 vs CA$111.14
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80
Buy for CA$33.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75537 minutes ago
AMD FX-Series FX-8320 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.5 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75537 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
