Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 61 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - CA$33.99 vs CA$122.15
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G3900 - 126 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for CA$33.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75504 minutes ago
Buy for CA$122.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75506 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
52.29522952295229%
Multi-Core
992
32.81508435329143%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |