Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 2423 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600 - CA$66.34 vs CA$169.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 5600 - CA$0.72 vs CA$1.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 28% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G3900 - 118 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
92
77%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13737 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
118
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.43/FPS
50%
Price, CA$
CA$169
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13737 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |