Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 2682 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - CA$66.34 vs CA$194.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i3-13100 - CA$0.46 vs CA$0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-13100 - 51 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 54% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G3900 - 223 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
145
65%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13735 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
223
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.87/FPS
52%
Price, CA$
CA$194
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$194 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |