Buy on Amazon
CA$33.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-2600K is 1696 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - CA$33.99 vs CA$350.0
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G3900 - 230 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80
Buy for CA$33.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75062 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-2600K Quad-Core Processor 3.4 Ghz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I72600K,Black
Buy for CA$350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75062 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i7-2600K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
86.97604790419162%
Multi-Core
992
42.758620689655174%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
