Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2600K is 1696 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - CA$42.99 vs CA$212.04
- Up to 79% better value when playing Watch Dogs: Legion than Core i7-2600K - CA$0.34 vs CA$1.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Celeron G3900 - 129 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
127
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$42.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$42.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
129
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.64/FPS
20%
Price, CA$
CA$212.04
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$212.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |