Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6500T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6500T is 61 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-6500T - CA$64.99 vs CA$310.41
- Up to 74% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-6500T - CA$0.84 vs CA$3.17 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500T
- Performs up to 27% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G3900 - 98 vs 77 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
77
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$64.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$64.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10303 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
98
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.17/FPS
26%
Price, CA$
CA$310.41
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$310.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10303 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-6500T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |