Buy on Amazon
CA$42.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 1405 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800X - CA$42.99 vs CA$449.08
- Up to 90% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen 7 3800X - CA$0.08 vs CA$0.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 7% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G3900 - 543 vs 508 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
508
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$42.99
100%
Value Winner
INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80
Buy for CA$42.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 3800X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
543
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.83/FPS
9%
Price, CA$
CA$449.08
9%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X 8-Core, 16-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler
Buy for CA$449.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen 7 3800X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
