Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 2968 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-14600KF - CA$96.1 vs CA$434.43
- Up to 64% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-14600KF - CA$0.6 vs CA$1.68 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 63% better in Rust than Celeron G3900 - 259 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
159
61%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$96.1
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$96.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
259
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.68/FPS
35%
Price, CA$
CA$434.43
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$434.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-14600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |