Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - CA$33.99 vs CA$293.99
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G3900 - 252 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$33.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75544 minutes ago
Buy for CA$293.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75544 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
26.761860893597422%
Multi-Core
992
10.81670483044379%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |