Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1293 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 16% better in Valorant than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 869 vs 750 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - CA$185.3 vs CA$378.88
- Up to 43% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-11900F - CA$0.25 vs CA$0.44 per FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
869
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.44/FPS
56%
Price, CA$
CA$378.88
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$378.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
750
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$185.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$185.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |