Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 3051 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - CA$66.34 vs CA$324.72
- Up to 77% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-14400F - CA$0.46 vs CA$2.03 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Dead Space than Celeron G3900 - 160 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
145
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19231 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
160
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.03/FPS
22%
Price, CA$
CA$324.72
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$324.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19231 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |