Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - CA$66.34 vs CA$304.99
- Up to 71% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-11600K - CA$0.6 vs CA$2.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 32% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G3900 - 145 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
110
75%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14200 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
145
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.1/FPS
28%
Price, CA$
CA$304.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$304.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |