Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - CA$42.99 vs CA$357.87
- Up to 87% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-10700F - CA$0.37 vs CA$2.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 6% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G3900 - 124 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
117
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$42.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$42.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.89/FPS
12%
Price, CA$
CA$357.87
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$357.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |