Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 1220 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - CA$66.34 vs CA$214.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i7-3770K - CA$0.26 vs CA$0.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 51 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 2% better in Apex Legends than Celeron G3900 - 263 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
259
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13726 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
263
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.81/FPS
32%
Price, CA$
CA$214
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$214 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13726 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |