Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 1220 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - CA$66.34 vs CA$104.99
- Up to 36% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-3770 - CA$0.43 vs CA$0.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 51 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G3900 - 157 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
156
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14403 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
157
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.67/FPS
64%
Price, CA$
CA$104.99
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$104.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14403 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |