Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 273 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - CA$67.21 vs CA$215.43
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 31% better in F1 23 than Celeron G3900 - 206 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$67.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 344 minutes ago
Buy for CA$215.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 345 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
47.467320261437905%
Multi-Core
992
17.523405758699877%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |