Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 2409 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - CA$188.88 vs CA$243.72
- Up to 18% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-13100F - CA$0.74 vs CA$0.9 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 6% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-6800K - 270 vs 255 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
255
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$188.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13330 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
270
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.9/FPS
82%
Price, CA$
CA$243.72
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$243.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13329 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |