Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4460 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4460 is 478 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-4460 - CA$42.99 vs CA$69.99
- Up to 33% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-4460 - CA$0.28 vs CA$0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Core i5-4460 - 51 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G3900 - 166 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
154
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$42.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$42.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
166
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.42/FPS
66%
Price, CA$
CA$69.99
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |