Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3381 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 19% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8320 - 379 vs 318 FPS
- Up to 61% cheaper than FX-8320 - CA$119.0 vs CA$307.17
- Up to 68% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than FX-8320 - CA$0.31 vs CA$0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 58 vs 125 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for CA$307.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4574 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
379
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$119
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4575 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |