Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3319 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 16% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-3820 - 108 vs 93 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - CA$110.0 vs CA$134.65
- Up to 6% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-10105 - CA$1.18 vs CA$1.25 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
108
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.25/FPS
94%
Price, CA$
CA$134.65
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$134.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
93
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$110
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |