Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2999 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - CA$110.0 vs CA$149.62
- Up to 16% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-10400F - CA$0.52 vs CA$0.62 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-3820 - 240 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
213
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$110
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
240
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.62/FPS
83%
Price, CA$
CA$149.62
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$149.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |